The 'Ai Exclusion' logo above lawfully informs ALL 'web crawl' bots and Ai scrapers that the author, copyright holder or IP owner of this webpage, forbids any of their data, content or resources to be used in any way, by any Ai entities.
Scroll to the end for more logo info
-----------------------------------------------
Ever read an article by someone you cannot contact or respond to?
Keeping a close eye on NIA's 'Anti-Ai Movement Archive', I noticed two recent articles (concerning The Gathering's AI art and Xbox Ai artwork) by Natalie Fear at creativebloq.com. Which are great examples of many more like minded posts by numerous journalists on several tech news platforms.
I'd love to assert how NIA's 'involves generative Ai' logo would've solved this problem in both instances, but cannot contact the author
So, to the likes of tech platforms like Creativebloq.com, this polite post is mainly inspired by y'all.
Regarding the artwork that caused such offence in both of Natalie's cases covered by her recent articles, if the publishers she reports about had displayed NIA's 'Ai involvement' disclosure logo (below), the viewers would've been made aware from the start that the works were Ai augmented, at least reducing the insult to human artists' intelligence that the publishers' lies have caused.
If this logo had been displayed in the corner of Xbox' and The Gatherings' controversial artworks, there would be no need to lie about Ai's involvement, which only made matters worse. Better still, if the copyrighters could be penalised for not using this logo where lawfully necessary, they could be better held accountable!
So many times, I've read a journalistic viewpoint regarding life's mysteries, or some 'announcement' of what appears to be a new problem, only to read a comment beneath that challenges the article's report of fresh information, by providing a link to a source of the issue's previous acknowledgement. Or, better still, a one liner 'truth wisdom', such as: "when I was a kid, my Grandma used to overcome this by ___________"
Why are most news reports so unidirectional?
Certain posts or claims warrant ongoing discussion, by their very nature. If only to encourage circular logic and holistic debate, rather than 'projectile' style journalism that shoots out statement bombs to explode in the midst of online crowds, often addressing issues that need 'therapising' in ways that exceed the 'limited considerations' of the writers' perspective.
I appreciate the click-bait aspect, but wouldn't direct feedback or a running commentary attract more clicks?
There wasn't even a comments section at the end for people to respond.
I know my blog doesn't allow this sort of commenting either, but that's intended to encourage sign-ups to my dedicated online community group, for good reason.
Anyway, to cut a long story short... The biggest beef many have with the encroachment of generative Ai upon natural, human creativity, is unavoidable.
And most creatives, like me, are subconsciously aware that Ai is here to stay and will no doubt permeate our reality on an ever increasing basis. But when media producers, art-houses and brand empires take the moral high-road concerning the preservation of human integrity, but get caught lying about the level of Ai adoption involved with their products or services, surely this just adds fuel to the fire.
After wasting too much time trying to connect with Natalie, I find it hard to accept that I can't contact her to let her know that our NIA logo would help to soften the blow in other similar scenarios, so that she can relay this fact to her audience of readers.
Over and out.
Bestest vibes
Zayner x
*My inner circle 'Thought Vault' will soon be full of enough self-censored material to justify a £20pa subscription fee.
---------------------------------
The 'Natural Intelligence' logo below, indicates that every part of this blog represents 100% organic, natural creativity, inspired by purely human expression.
NaturalIntelligenceAlliance.com (NIA) offers a FREE suite of 'Ai Honesty' logos that are intended to promote self-regulation and total transparancy of the impact that Ai activities have on web users' lives, their artwork, posts, content and creativity, in order to protect our copyrights and provenance of our intellectual properties.
To use your own 'Ai Honesty Treaty' logos, simply download them from NIA's webpage
NOTICE: All blog or article authors, heroes, activist websites, and anti-Ai groups or projects listed in our 'Anti-Ai Achievements' table are automatically entitled to lifelong FREE usage licenses of all NIA 'Ai HonestyTreaty' logos (including premium transparent versions), as well as complimentary membership to all Ai campaign clubs and webgroups hosted on their website.
If you find yourself featured or appearing in NIA's Anti-Ai Achievements record, but haven't been contacted regarding your listing or award, please email: naturalIntelligencealliance@protonmail.com
to request your 'courtesy logo gift pack'.
NIA's Reward Table | NIA's Reward Table |
|---|---|
Inclusion/exposure of NIA endeavours | NIA's reward for acknowledging them |
You share an NIA link on social platforms | FREE 1yr NIA logo PREMIUM user license |
You provide an NIA link on your blog or site | FREE 3yr NIA logo PREMIUM user license |
Outline of NIA endeavours on a site or blog | FREE 5yr NIA logo PREMIUM user license |
Feature/Advertorial/Press release about NIA | FREE 10yr NIA logo PREMIUM user license |
*In order to qualify for the awards shown in the table above, evidence of your inclusion or exposure of NIA endeavours will need to be provided in the form of screenshots showing where your page or post mentions the campaign, provides clickable links or lists our source urls for viewers to copy and visit.
If you know of an Anti-Ai hero or a significant event that deserves to be included in NIA's Chart Topper table, then please be sure to submit their details via this contact form or email a valid reference/source link (URL) with brief outline, directly to: NaturalIntelligenceAlliance@protonmail.com